I feel compelled to respond to Chandler McCorkle’s guest opinion (“Judge failed rape victim, society,” Daily Camera, Aug. 14) because it proceeds from woefully erroneous assumptions about the nature of sex offense probation and sentencing. Ms. McCorkle states that the sentence means that sex offender probationary sentences do not carry “true repercussion(s),” and the judge’s sentence was “naïve [and] unthinkably stupid.” With all due respect, she could not be more wrong. Full Opinion Piece
Related posts
-
CO: Colorado Child Porn Law Didn’t Ban Deepfake Porn Until Recent Amendments, Court Holds
Source: reason.com 10/14/25 From In the Interest of Juvenile: S.G.H., decided yesterday by the Colorado Supreme Court,... -
CO: Douglas County judge wrongly blocked man from de-registering as sex offender due to alleged ‘smirk,’ appeals court finds
Source: coloradopolitics.com 8/21/25 A Douglas County judge acted improperly by refusing to grant a defendant’s request... -
CO: Denver police to review 422 sex assault cases handled by discredited CBI scientist Missy Woods
Source: denverpost.com 4/7/25 The Denver Police Department will independently review more than 400 sex assault cases...

And that’s an extremely honest view of the reality of being convicted on one or more sex offense charges in many states. No state can be used as an example of going soft on sex offense conviction consequences because none of them approach anywhere near soft. Even federal convictions are harsh and in many cases more disastrous than state cases.
Judges JUDGE! He made a judgement, that’s his job!
You don’t have to like it. I didn’t like the judgment I got, but too bad!